Boardroom Answers · Strategic Command · Business Value & ROI
How big is this market really? Give me your TAM, SAM and SOM, and tell me which numbers you actually believe.?
The question a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) asks.
The short answer
Top-down, we sit where GRC, board software and AI governance overlap — billions each. Bottom-up, at $1.5k–$108k per organisation per year, a thousand customers is a real company. I believe the bottom-up number; the rest is context.
The full executive answer
Let me define terms first, because these acronyms hide sins: TAM is total addressable market — everyone who could conceivably buy; SAM is serviceable addressable market — the slice our current product and go-to-market can actually reach; SOM is serviceable obtainable market — what we can realistically win in the planning horizon. Top-down, we sit at the intersection of three analyst-tracked categories: governance-risk-and-compliance software, board-management software, and the fast-growing AI-governance tooling segment — each independently estimated in the billions to tens of billions of dollars annually, with AI governance the fastest-growing of the three. I treat those top-down figures as directional context only, and I would encourage you to do the same.
The number I actually believe is the bottom-up SOM, because it is built from our real price list rather than an analyst chart. Our tiers run from $149 a month for a small leadership team, through $649 and $1,799, to enterprise agreements starting at $9,000 a month — roughly $1,500 to $108,000 of annual recurring revenue per organisation. There are hundreds of thousands of mid-market and enterprise boards and executive committees in English-speaking markets alone; winning a low four-digit count of organisations at a blended mid-tier price is a $10–50 million revenue business, which does not require heroic market-share assumptions — it requires execution in a category regulation is actively inflating, as the EU AI Act phases in through 2026–2027 and boards are forced to evidence AI oversight.
Honest caveat: we are pre-launch, so our SAM boundary — which segments convert, at which tier, at what sales cost — is a hypothesis we will validate with the first fifty paying organisations. I would rather give you a defensible bottom-up model with stated assumptions than a confident trillion-dollar TAM slide.
Grounded in: TAM/SAM/SOM · EU AI Act (regulatory demand driver)
The natural next questions
Related governed answers
- In one minute, without jargon: what problem does this solve for me and my board that a good chief of staff plus ChatGPT does not?
- You have no live customers, no case studies, no NPS. Why should my company be your beta test?
- Build me the business case. TCO, ROI, payback period, NPV — and do not give me "time saved" hand-waving.?
Want this answered live, on your data?